[quote author=utfootball4 link=topic=1731.msg49786#msg49786 date=1174194430]
[quote author=blacklightning link=topic=1731.msg49785#msg49785 date=1174193892]
[quote author=mike link=topic=1731.msg39457#msg39457 date=1154635441]
[quote author=utfootball4 link=topic=1731.msg39439#msg39439 date=1154579109]i know some may disagree but the first 10m can be taken care in the weight room, if you are strong as hell ur chances of having a good start is much better.
I wholeheartedly agree...this is why throwers and weightlifters are often faster than sprinters for the first 10-15m. This is one of the reasons I work squats with my short sprinters so hard. Having said that, winning the race to 10m/yd doesn't necessarily correlate with winning the race to 40m/yd (and certainly not to 100m). If an athlete has poor mechanics, brute strength in the first couple strides can more than make up for it but after that point I don't think that brute strength will help you get out of the bad positions you might have put yourself in to.
i just really started weight training this school yr. and im not a reall big guy, i run the 100/200. in the fall my first 20m was the great. i got out faster than everyone on my team, we also squatted heavy 3 days/wk. then starting in nov we stopped squatting all together and just did OL's. ever since then my start and first 20m has been noticably slower. do u think the absence of squats is the reason for my poor starts?
i know everyone is different but with myself if my squats and cleans are not strong then my first 30m isnt strong. where you focusing more on your accel during the fall?
we've always been been doing sprint starts since about nov. we did not change anything as far as that