Quick search:

Elitetrack: Sport Training & Conditioning

Vitamin World   running shoes & apparel

   
 
stride lengths to the first hurdle
Posted: 07 December 2004 05:37 AM   [ Ignore ]  
Full Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  117
Joined  2003-09-05

Does anyone have data on the stride distances to the first hurdle for collegiate or int’l men?  I would think that these numbers would be pretty consistent across performance levels.  Has anybody used tape marks for the 8 strides to the first hurdle?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 December 2004 08:51 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  377
Joined  2003-08-29

Stride length is difficult to measure to the first hurdle because each step is a different length.  Since you’re accelerating to the first hurdle, each step would be longer than the one before.  Finding exact numbers for these legnths would be hard.

 Signature 

USATF Level I
USATF Level II Sprints/Hurdles/Relays
USATF Level II Jumps

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 December 2004 02:55 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Jr. Member
RankRank
Total Posts:  67
Joined  2004-10-21

The Russans used to measure stride lengths by running on long lengths of paper layed out on the track(!) 

Since the invention of digital video cameras it is not hard to put distance indicators by the side of the track, film, play-back frame by frame and then measure the stride lengths. 

Have a look at the web site http://www.ukhurdlesclub.net and browse through the coaching section.  You will probably find what you need there.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 December 2004 02:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Full Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  117
Joined  2003-09-05

Originally posted by PZale8018
Stride length is difficult to measure to the first hurdle because each step is a different length.  Since you’re accelerating to the first hurdle, each step would be longer than the one before.  Finding exact numbers for these legnths would be hard.

I realize that, yes.  It’s not just a matter of dividing 13.72 (or 11.62, if you assume a 1.1m takeoff distance) by 8 to get the stride length.  That’s why it’s not easy to figure out. 

Simon, I’ll try your suggestion of putting distance indicators by the track.  The problem is that this method determines what a given hurdler is currently taking, not what is optimal.  That’s why I’d like data on elite athletes (of which I have none wink

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 December 2004 04:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  875
Joined  2004-05-15

I realize that, yes.  It’s not just a matter of dividing 13.72 (or 11.62, if you assume a 1.1m takeoff distance) by 8 to get the stride length.  That’s why it’s not easy to figure out. 

nice math

 Signature 

?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 December 2004 05:53 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  750
Joined  2004-03-18

It is probably varies for different body types. Depending on height and build.  I don’t really see why you want to know.

 Signature 

Train hard, win easy.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 December 2004 07:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]  
Full Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  117
Joined  2003-09-05

Sprinters of various body types all take 8 strides to the first hurdle (with a few 7-step exceptions with which I’m not interested). 

I’d like to know because I’d like to know when a given hurdler is straying from an optimal acceleration pattern to the first hurdle.  It’s helpful to look at shin angles, but wouldn’t it be nice to have a tape mark down as a training and evaluation aid?

“I don’t know why you want to know” seems like a cop-out….:wink:

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 December 2004 07:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  750
Joined  2004-03-18
 Signature 

Train hard, win easy.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 December 2004 07:04 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  750
Joined  2004-03-18

Originally posted by duck
“I don’t know why you want to know” seems like a cop-out….:wink:

I was just wondering.

 Signature 

Train hard, win easy.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 December 2004 05:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]  
Jr. Member
RankRank
Total Posts:  67
Joined  2004-10-21

Duck,
I don’t think what you are looking for exists - although it is a nice idea.

Justification: IMHO The key distance is the take-off distance from the hurdle.  The optimum take-off distance for any athlete varies according to their anthropometrical characteristics (height, leg length, etc).  For similar reasons the length of athlete’s first stride out of the blocks varies conciderably.  So the distance from first contact to take-off is different for each athlete.  The way that distance is covered also varies due to different acceleration patterns (related to anthropometrics again and strength and muscle type).

Film, measure, analyse, train, film again, check differences, repeat!!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 December 2004 07:45 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]  
Full Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  117
Joined  2003-09-05

Originally posted by Fraek
I realize that, yes.  It’s not just a matter of dividing 13.72 (or 11.62, if you assume a 1.1m takeoff distance) by 8 to get the stride length.  That’s why it’s not easy to figure out. 

nice math

lol, 2.1 m takeoff.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 December 2004 06:02 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]  
Jr. Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  83
Joined  2003-11-13

these are “about right” so that you can put tape down and film or have a coach watch
women (in meters) from start line
.5
1.6
2.9
4.35
5.90
7.55
9.30
11.00

men
.6
1.8
3.15
4.65
6.25
8.0
9.85
11.70

These marks use progressive stride lenghtening and cut step and keep you away from hurdle far enough to give efficient parabola.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 December 2004 07:44 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]  
Full Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  117
Joined  2003-09-05

Thanks RonG, that’s what I was looking for.  I’ll try those out.

Profile