00Scoots - 03 June 2008 08:41 PM
Honestly I would think that drugs such as hgh and EPO would be used more in the NBA than track simply because of the higher pay and how long and physical the season is.
I agree with both you and davan to a certain extent on each of your points. I think the % of superstars in the NBA using PEDs is the same as or higher as elite track athletes, but taking into account the whole NBA to whole of elite track athletes (not everyone with IAAF bio competing, just world finalists) the NBA will have a smaller percentage. However if we considered elite track and field the top 50 in each event worldwide, I think it would balance out to around the same as the % as the NBA.
Someone brought up swimming, but swimming is riddled big time with doping especially the elite levels. You have kids aged 10-12 swimming 3-5 miles in workouts a day at somepoint most of these kids in the next 4-8 years of their lives have to consider taking PEDs to keep up with their peers who may or may not be using PED’s just because the intensity of the workouts are higher and of a slightly higher volume. Individual sports are more likely to be infested with doping problems, but cycling has shown team structure can also play a role in highly regimented doping system as well as the old East German system.
Also, Operation Puerto in Spain besides implicating mostly cyclists, also implicated several soccer and tennis players in Europe.
Right now, Project Clean and the UCI’s Biological Passport are great examples of what needs to be done in all sports. Also, the testing programs and penalties athletes receive in US professional team sports are a joke. They should fall in line with most other Olympic sports and give a 2 year ban for the first offense and then a lifetime ban for a second offense.
This thread has kind of gotten off topic so I am kind of done with this topic and doping unless we relating it Bolt and his 9.72s race. If someone else wants to make a doping thread go right ahead and I’ll dive right in.