Lets look how far men’s US track has fallen.
Going into the World Athletics Finals. The US has zero 100m sprinters qualified on points (top 8) based on Grand Prix, Super Grand Prix, and Golden League meet performances. The point system is heavily weighted towards Super Grand Prix and Golden League performances. The top ranked American 100m sprinter in points is Michael Rodgers at #9. That’s right Michael Who? 2nd best is a guy who decided stop running as a collegian 1/2 way through the summer in Travis Padgett. The top 2 are Bolt and Powell, Nesta Carter is 3rd and at #6 is Michael Frater.
Even a healthy Gay would have had to have a run a top 3 in at least one of these meets between the trials and the Olympics to make it, not something that was unlikely but probably the best he could put forward is 3rd.
While the WAF is not in the same league as a WC or OG, they are certainly a part of why Grand Prix races are raced at a high level approaching Super Grand Prix’s and GL meets. What’s at stake in the WAF, well it’s $30,000. If you score enough points to make the WAF and finish in the top 5. It’s likely you scored over 100 grand in prize money. Give 25% of that to your coach and agent you have 75G’s, use another 15G’s to pay off your sponsors for travel and you have 60G’s to live, train, and pay for therapy. What you have is a sustainable livelihood as a sprinter even if you did not have a shoe contract. So lets look at the last WAF after an OG in the 100m in 2004.
We had 4 sprinters in the 100m, Capel, Brunson, Scott, and Johnson. In 2004 we only had 1 in 200m as compared to the 2 this year. That’s a change of 5 to 2. Sure some of this can be attributed to the influx of collegiate sprinters this year into the US Elite, but not anymore than 2004 offered in say (Spearmon and Gay) compared to Padgett and Dix this year.
Well at least we have 5 qualified in the shot compared to 2004.