Quick search:

Elitetrack: Sport Training & Conditioning



   
1 of 3
1
Training Thoughts
Posted: 22 December 2009 09:37 AM   [ Ignore ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  850
Joined  2003-04-14

Here is some food for thought to spur you thinking:It is relatively easy to get strongIt is very easy to make someone slowerI am interested in your comments, before I post mine. This is how I began my presentation to the Throws group at USA Track & Field Podium Education program
 
Continue reading…

 Signature 

Vern is currently is the Director of Gambetta Sports Training Systems. He has been the a conditioning coach for several teams in Major League Soccer as well as the conditioning consultant to the US Men’s World Cup Soccer team. Vern is the former Director of Conditioning for the Chicago White Sox and Director of Athletic Development for the New York Mets. Vern is recognized internationally as an expert in training and conditioning for sport having worked with world class athletes and teams in a wide variety of sports. He is a popular speaker and writer on conditioning topics having lectured and conducted clinics in Canada, Japan, Australia and Europe. Vern's coaching experience spans 36 years

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 December 2009 10:03 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  25
Joined  2009-07-14

Really good post to consider….reminds me of your older post with the picture of the LSU (i believe? correct me if I’m wrong) shotputter squatting idk like 800lbs plus and how he was on the front page of their website and so on. The more and more I learn about athletic development the more I begin to realize that strength is merely a tool in the toolbox in the workshop that produces the individuals who wish to excel at a particular SPORT. I love weightlifting and crushing huge weights but reading your materials and others such as carl valle, frank dick etc has only increased my knowledge of athletic development and prompted to remind myself to not become emotionally attached to a particular tool. Keep up the great posts!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 December 2009 03:33 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  881
Joined  2009-04-07

Will be interesting to see the throwing communities’ reaction to that.  You’re definitely right, it is easy to make people slower!!  This feels a little like “bear droppings” v2.0 smile !

I still veer toward the belief that the stronger you can get, without sacrificing elasticity, overtaxing your CNS to the extent that you can’t train for your event - technically or physically - the better.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 December 2009 04:14 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3031
Joined  2008-01-30

The very important part of what you said Matt in my opinion is the elastic development aspect. If this can be trained to optimum then the max strength training will also be optimized and most efficiently used by speed/power athletes.

If not, then all that strength and time spent developing it, would be a waste.

 Signature 

http://www.youtube.com/jumperuk
http://www.vpsmanagement.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 December 2009 05:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
Full Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  150
Joined  2007-11-03

It is easy to get someone stronger. While not as easy, it is possible to get someone faster. Unfortunately, this doesn’t always imply improved sports performance.

If one sprints adequate volumes each week, how much more “elastic” can training get than that?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 December 2009 05:34 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3031
Joined  2008-01-30

Sprinting is not the only way to develop elasticity and so there are of course other ways…variety is always best…JUST sprinting isn;t the best way.

 Signature 

http://www.youtube.com/jumperuk
http://www.vpsmanagement.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 December 2009 07:46 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]  
Hero Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1686
Joined  2003-11-18

I think it being easier to develop makes it more valuable.  Obviously how often it is used in a program is a different story.

 Signature 

Senior at EWU

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 December 2009 08:05 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]  
Newbie
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  32
Joined  2005-03-27

I believe big squat numbers can be a problem when other qualities (like elasticity) aren’t developed. I believe this is a major problem in American football.

 Signature 

Randy Gillon

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 December 2009 10:02 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  881
Joined  2009-04-07
Randy Gillon - 22 December 2009 08:05 PM

I believe big squat numbers can be a problem when other qualities (like elasticity) aren’t developed. I believe this is a major problem in American football.

Why is that a problem in American Football?  Those guys are extremely fast, strong, and agile.

Nick is right - Just sprinting isn’t the only/best way to develop elasticity for sprinting and jumping performance.  Plyos are great (especially various types of depth and CM jumps and bounds). Olympic lifts are great, as long as you are not doing a high catch. You can even do Powerlifting (Squat/Bench/DL) moves in a manner that promotes elastic strength.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 December 2009 12:42 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  318
Joined  2004-10-20

What is wrong with the high catch?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 December 2009 06:51 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]  
Full Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  150
Joined  2007-11-03

I wasn’t saying that reactive training be limited to sprinting.

Sprinting is at the top of the reactive mountain. You have to come down a little in elevation to get to plyos.

If one sprints 2-3 x week, how many foot contacts is that? You could throw in some warm-up sprints on top of that, too.

I just think that sometimes people place too much value in plyos.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 December 2009 09:49 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]  
Newbie
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  32
Joined  2005-03-27

I wasn’t speaking of the pros. Besides at very high level of sport many athletes excell in spite of questionable training. In football (at the college level) strength at all positions appears to be the greatest priority…..Just my observation.

 Signature 

Randy Gillon

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 December 2009 09:56 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  881
Joined  2009-04-07
Brooke Burkhalter - 23 December 2009 12:42 AM

What is wrong with the high catch?

Nothing. I actually do high catch for many of my cleans, It just doesn’t do a much for elastic development as a lower catch.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 December 2009 09:32 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  593
Joined  2007-01-24

Not to disagree with anthing said so far…but I often hear this “its easy to get strong” stuff, but the fact is I don’t run across very many strong athletes. There are plenty of strong guys out there, but I don’t buy into the “its as easy as falling out of a boat” school. I’ve seen more than my share of high school, college, and even professional athletes who have been lifting for years but aren’t that strong. Certainly, its easier to get someone strong that it is to make someone fast, but if your strength traiing is without attention to intensity and volume, your progress will be slower and limited.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 December 2009 10:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]  
Hero Member
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3031
Joined  2008-01-30

In your opinion what is “strong”? in terms of lbs/ BW

Parallel Squat =
Bench =
Clean =

Thanks

 Signature 

http://www.youtube.com/jumperuk
http://www.vpsmanagement.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 December 2009 11:46 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]  
Hero Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1634
Joined  2004-06-21

Is that a joke? Most people, assuming they are putting forth adequate effort and in a non-inept training plan (doesn’t need to be anything special), are going to max out most of the strength gains possible outside of specialization and be strong for their sport (which isn’t powerlifting or weightlifting). Even then, specialization isn’t going to be increasing general strength levels, but more-so enhancing technique, rate coding, etc. Getting a bigger arch and a shorter and more efficient stroke on bench press isn’t exactly increasing your strength, just letting you express it differently.

It goes without saying, I think most of the people here are defining strong as strong enough to do what they need to do for their sport. You don’t need to be that strong in the weight room to be fast or jump high or be explosive on the field or court. Plenty of guys can’t squat 2x BW and are plenty strong for their sport and they have reached adequate strength levels. Mind you, these lifts are also being done often after their sport training and done submaximally, on top of not being done with the same technique as powerlifters, skewing the numbers to the lower side of what would be otherwise easy to achieve.

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 3
1