It does seem like you’ve been singled out for some aggressive criticism…
That said, I would think you should welcome the opportunity to outline the merits of your training POV…
Carl and others are raising valid challenges about the whether your methods can be applied across many events. You also have valid points about training using training most relevant to actual event performance.
I think the debate is a good one, and not one where anyone should “take their ball and go home”…
Ultimately, each individual coach and athlete need to decide their own route to performance, and having diverse points of view allows for experimentation and learning what works for the individual in question.
I think the key is individualizing to each athlete. What works for one may not work for another.