Facebook Twitter Instagram
    ELITETRACK
    • Home
    • Articles
      • Endurance
      • Flexibility
      • Hurdles
      • Jumps
        • High Jump
        • Long Jump
        • Pole Vault
        • Triple Jump
      • Multi-Events
      • Periodization
      • Relays
      • Sports Science
        • Biomechanics
        • Coaching Science
        • Exercise Physiology
        • Muscle Dynamics
        • Nutrition
        • Restoration
        • Sport Psychology
      • Sprints
      • Strength Training
      • Throws
        • Discus
        • Hammer
        • Javelin
        • Shot Put
    • Blog
      • Mike Young’s Blog
      • Carl Valle’s Blog
      • John Evan’s Blog
      • Antonio Squillante’s Blog
      • Vern Gambetta’s Blog
      • John Grace’s Blog
      • Ryan Banta’s Blog
      • Guest Blog
    • Forums
    • Store
    • Log in
    ELITETRACK
    You are at:Home»Forums»Event Specific Discussion»Sprints»Faster Running Speeds Are Achieve By Applying More Force To The Ground.»Reply To:Faster Running Speeds Are Achieve By Applying More Force To The Ground.

    Reply To:Faster Running Speeds Are Achieve By Applying More Force To The Ground.

    Member
    4coach on March 13, 2013 at 12:23 am #119545

    Hi all

    I have not seen this journal article discussed on this site, so I have placed some selected paragraphs below.
    NB this article is freely available to all.
    Muscular strategy shift in human running: dependence of running speed on hip and ankle muscle performance. J Exp Biol. 2012 Jun 1;215(Pt 11):1944-56. Dorn TW, Schache AG, Pandy MG.
    Runners appear to use two different strategies to increase their speed. Up to ~7ms-1, running speed is increased by exerting larger support forces during ground contact, which has been shown to correlate with increases in stride length.

    Larger ground forces can be generated at lower running speeds because the leg muscles have enough time to develop the forces needed to lift and accelerate the body during stance (Weyand et al., 2000). At speeds near 7ms-1, however, ground contact times become very small (Kunz and Kaufmann,1981; Mann and Herman, 1985; Mann, 1981), limiting the ability of the leg muscles to generate the ground forces needed to increase running speed still further (Weyand et al., 2000).

    Above ~7ms-1, the primary strategy used to increase running speed shifts from the goal of increasing stride length to that of increasing stride frequency, which is achieved by accelerating the
    legs more rapidly through the air. Peak hip-flexor, hip-extensor and knee-flexor moments all increase significantly at speeds above 7ms-1 (Belli et al., 2002; Schache et al., 2011).

    The percentage increase in stride length was greater than that in stride frequency as running speed
    increased from 3.5 to 7.0ms-1, but the opposite effect was observed at speeds above 7.0ms-1 (Fig.2A, Table2). Ground contact time decreased monotonically as running speed increased (P<0.01;
    Fig.2B, Table2). Aerial time and effective vertical ground impulse both reached their maxima at 7.0ms-1 before decreasing at higher speeds (Fig.2B).

    Across all running speeds, SOL, GAS and VAS provided roughly 75% of the total vertical support impulse needed to accelerate the body upward, with SOL contributing as much as 50%. For speeds up to 7.0ms-1, increases in the vertical ground reaction force were due almost entirely to the action of SOL. The contribution of VAS to the vertical ground force did not increase as running speed increased.

    Peak forces developed by the ankle plantarflexors decreased at the higher running speeds for two
    possible reasons. First, the muscles may have been operating at lengths much shorter or longer than the muscles' optimum fibre lengths (Close, 1972; Gordon et al., 1966; Woledge et al., 1985); and second,
    the contractile velocities may have been too high to allow the muscles to develop high forces.

    The model calculations showed that stride frequency was increased by increasing the forces generated by the hip-spanning muscles, primarily ILPSO, GMAX and HAMS, as these muscles contributed significantly to the larger hip- and knee-joint accelerations observed at higher running speeds.

    Like Us On Facebook
    - Facebook Members WordPress Plugin
    Highest Rated Posts
    • A Review of 400m Training Methods 79 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 5 (4.92 out of 5)
    • 2008 Olympics: Usain’s Insane 100m 67 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 5 (4.96 out of 5)
    • Top 10 Myths of Sprinting Mechanics 66 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 5 (4.74 out of 5)
    • 14 reasons why Jamaica is the Sprint Capitol of the World 59 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 5 (4.85 out of 5)
    • 12 Reasons to Squat Year Round 58 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 5 (4.86 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why All Athletes Should Sprint 63 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 5 (4.32 out of 5)
    • 4 Tips for Keeping up with Sport Science Research 65 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 5 (4.03 out of 5)
    • Loren Seagrave’s thoughts on Absolute Strength 54 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 5 (4.80 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why Jamaicans Dominate the Sprints 50 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 5 (4.78 out of 5)
    • Developing Endurance in Speed-Power Athletes 58 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 5 (4.09 out of 5)
    Recent Topics
    • ?Where I can start in multievents trainig?
    • Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • Which fitness equipment do you use to exercise?
    About

    ELITETRACK is one of the longest standing sport training & conditioning sites on the web. We feature over 250 articles and 1000s of blog posts from some of the most knowledgeable and experienced track & field coaches on the web.

    Recent Posts
    • What You Should be Doing on Your Rest Days
    • Enjoying Sports into Retirement
    • Best Time in The Day to Workout
    • Should You Do Strength Training After 50?
    • What Are the Main Causes of Rounded Shoulders?
    Forum Activity
    • rudeboy on ?Where I can start in multievents trainig?
    • Pablo25 on How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • Josh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • Josh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • Josh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2015.
    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2021.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.