[quote author=”mortac8[Ashley Mort]” date=”1257411518″]250 in 28 is pretty good. You could probably run anywhere from 100-400. I would guess 11.1, 22.5, 50 (100/200/400).
Your times based on the 28 second 250..make no sense…
Why would he run 50 seconds for 400m based off a 28 250m?
If endurance was an issue you could say the 200m would 21-22 and if it wasn’t an issue you could say the 300m would be 35 which is fast…and doesn’t add up to a 50 in the 400m.[/quote]
Based off my experience. We have guys that run 37 FAT indoors and can’t break 52 or 23. I imagine his 250 was a bro hand-time meet. 49…50, whatever. Time will tell.