Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    ELITETRACK
    • Home
    • Articles
      • Endurance
      • Flexibility
      • Hurdles
      • Jumps
        • High Jump
        • Long Jump
        • Pole Vault
        • Triple Jump
      • Multi-Events
      • Periodization
      • Relays
      • Sports Science
        • Biomechanics
        • Coaching Science
        • Exercise Physiology
        • Muscle Dynamics
        • Nutrition
        • Restoration
        • Sport Psychology
      • Sprints
      • Strength Training
      • Throws
        • Discus
        • Hammer
        • Javelin
        • Shot Put
    • Blog
      • Mike Young’s Blog
      • Carl Valle’s Blog
      • John Evan’s Blog
      • Antonio Squillante’s Blog
      • Vern Gambetta’s Blog
      • John Grace’s Blog
      • Ryan Banta’s Blog
      • Guest Blog
    • Forums
    • Store
    ELITETRACK
    You are at:Home»Forums»General Discussions»Blog Discussion»Periodization Confusion by Mladen Jovanovic»Reply To:Periodization Confusion by Mladen Jovanovic

    Reply To:Periodization Confusion by Mladen Jovanovic

    Participant
    davan on August 1, 2013 at 3:25 am #120128

    What are you defining as long to short? Clyde Hart’s program doesn’t exactly get progressively shorter. It goes from higher volume, slower speed to lower volume, higher speed. The rep distances aren’t dramatically different. I don’t really understand what you are calling long to short in this situation. It’s like not he is running fast 600s or 800s to start his season and then cuts it down.

    I will need more detail because I’m perplexed when you say you took elements. What elements? It literally is “start with 12 x 200 and drop a rep and a second each month” essentially. Yeah, I’m dumbing it down, but that’s essentially what it amounts to. That isn’t what I would call long to short if you want to buy into that terminology. SMTC where guys are running FAST 500s and the like for 100m guys in the fall is much closer to the interpretation off ‘long to short’ (although they’re still doing starts and ‘technique work’ over short distances early on).

    I think those programs can have situational success because people don’t get fat and often don’t get hurt if they are durable and the coach/athlete relationship isn’t capable of handling any intensity in a program (ie poor or no attention to recovery). If you are fit, healthy, young, and not close to your potential, you’ll PR just showing up. In the context of most HS and college programs, athletes might even need these ridiculous tempo volumes since their coaches and teams subject them to ridiculous volumes of meets that might leave a faster, but less fit athlete out of commission. When I was in high school, we had at least 2 and often 3 meets a week, of which would involve 100/200/4×1/4×4 and the other an invite with prelims and finals in the 1/2 and then a 4×1. That’s insane volume. If you come into that without a lot of fitness, you’ll crumble if you are putting in a lot of effort into the races. That’s where talented lazy, potentially even uncaring athletes are key. They can survive that even if they aren’t perfectly fit because they are essentially performing submaximally.

    Highest Rated Posts
    • A Review of 400m Training Methods 79 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 5 (4.92 out of 5)
    • 2008 Olympics: Usain’s Insane 100m 67 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 5 (4.96 out of 5)
    • Top 10 Myths of Sprinting Mechanics 66 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 5 (4.74 out of 5)
    • 14 reasons why Jamaica is the Sprint Capitol of the World 59 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 5 (4.85 out of 5)
    • 12 Reasons to Squat Year Round 58 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 5 (4.86 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why All Athletes Should Sprint 63 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 5 (4.32 out of 5)
    • 4 Tips for Keeping up with Sport Science Research 65 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 5 (4.03 out of 5)
    • Loren Seagrave’s thoughts on Absolute Strength 54 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 5 (4.80 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why Jamaicans Dominate the Sprints 50 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 5 (4.78 out of 5)
    • Developing Endurance in Speed-Power Athletes 58 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 5 (4.09 out of 5)
    Recent Posts
    • Why Do Athletes Prefer Kratom Shots Over Other Methods Of Consumption?
    • Nutrition and Fitness for Athletes: Finding the Perfect Balance
    • Evidence Based Recovery for Peak Performance
    • Dealing With Chronic Back Pain: 4 Ways To Cope
    • Effective Strategies to Lose Fat

    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2023.

    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2023.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.