dp times in the 100, 200, 400 correlate with each other or it doesnt matter. Say you run a 10.8 in the hundred and a 24 on the 200 does this make sense. Well, anyway I want my times to drop.
[i]Originally posted by krayzieondaline[/i]
Ofcourse when some one run a sub 20 @200 he should run sub 10@100(Ato Boldon)
And sub 44 means sub 20 (MJ)
…uhh not really, both things you said are extremely hard to do consistently, with the exception of those you listed and some others. look at montgomery fastest 100m ever 9.78 but cant do any better than a 20.3 200. i know hes on roids and everything but its a good example
[i]Originally posted by OffTheBlocks[/i]
…uhh not really, both things you said are extremely hard to do consistently, with the exception of those you listed and some others. look at montgomery fastest 100m ever 9.78 but cant do any better than a 20.3 200. i know hes on roids and everything but its a good example
Well actually I ment starting with the 200m you know what i mean?
I heard ato saying ”when I got my sub20 I got my sub10”
I mean if you can do sub 20 than you should do sub10 not the opposit
[i]Originally posted by Nickjump20[/i]
dp times in the 100, 200, 400 correlate with each other or it doesnt matter. Say you run a 10.8 in the hundred and a 24 on the 200 does this make sense. Well, anyway I want my times to drop.
100: 10.8 below
200: 22 below
400: 50 below
If you are running 10.8 in the 100 and 24 in the 200 (assuming both times are FAT) you have a serious fitness issue.
The times definitely correlate across events but the extent is largely due to training emphasis and fitness level. With 10.8 speed, you should be able to run around 22 seconds.