Does anyone think that fasting is beneficial for athlete? Could it be a good detoxifier or will it impede recovery due to lack of nutrition?
Fasting
-
-
I've heard this argument before to be honest it sounds like complete and total nonsense to me. The body doesn't need fasting to "detoxify." It takes care of this process naturally. If you starve the body, the natural and normal functions of the body such as detoxification will suffer and more harm will be done than good. A balanced nutritional diet with minimal processed foods is the best way to "detoxify."
ELITETRACK Founder
-
I have found that fasting has helped our swimmers stay healthy by severely reducing calories on recovery days. The efforts to digest a high frequency of meals during heavy days is tough on the system. The research on the immune system and caloric load and insulin response is rather clear that large, high GI meals, can impair many of the cell repsonses if the body is under severe fatigue. Fasting can only be done during a very light training week with two days off. The fasting day again must be after the athlete's glycogen stores have been "topped off". Various soups and simple meals can be consumed, providing that they add up to less then 2000 kcal. I prefer to do this mainly during the restoration phase after two weeks.
-
Poolshark-
I think we're referring to different kinds of fasts. I was referring to a true fast (0 caloric daily intake) which is often touted in homeopathic / anti-medicine / hollistic circles as a great means for detoxification. The fasting you refer to seems to be a reduced calorie diet. Like you mentioned, research has pointed out many benefits of a reduced calorie intake (at least for non-athletes). In fact, a recent study I looked at indicated that lowering caloric intake is highly correlated with increased life expectancy. This was not a result of reduced obesity or bodyfat but rather enhanced insulin response.ELITETRACK Founder
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.