low to high vs. high to low..anybody know

    Posted In: Sprints

        • Participant
          gin2312002 on February 21, 2007 at 3:45 am #12790

          anybody know the advantages/disadvantages of the 2 approaches…im doing the 200 and 400.my training partner does the 100 and 200..we have no coach but were thinking of which way to go and how to go..any input?

        • Participant
          cerebro on February 21, 2007 at 6:05 am #62948

          Are you talking about short to long or long to short? There are a lot of threads on it, try a search.

        • Participant
          gin2312002 on February 21, 2007 at 9:16 pm #62949

          yea yea thas what i meant short to long vs. long to short?

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on February 26, 2007 at 11:57 am #62950

          This is a loaded question and you'll get some answers by doing a search but in a nutshell, short-to-long setups appear to have an edge over long-to-short setups for short sprinters and both programs appear to be equally successful for long sprinters. In the end you have to decide based on your own personal situations.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          gin2312002 on March 8, 2007 at 3:13 am #62951

          if u know any links pleez lemme kno..cuz i havent reely found anything

    Viewing 4 reply threads
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.