Facebook Twitter Instagram
    ELITETRACK
    • Home
    • Articles
      • Endurance
      • Flexibility
      • Hurdles
      • Jumps
        • High Jump
        • Long Jump
        • Pole Vault
        • Triple Jump
      • Multi-Events
      • Periodization
      • Relays
      • Sports Science
        • Biomechanics
        • Coaching Science
        • Exercise Physiology
        • Muscle Dynamics
        • Nutrition
        • Restoration
        • Sport Psychology
      • Sprints
      • Strength Training
      • Throws
        • Discus
        • Hammer
        • Javelin
        • Shot Put
    • Blog
      • Mike Young’s Blog
      • Carl Valle’s Blog
      • John Evan’s Blog
      • Antonio Squillante’s Blog
      • Vern Gambetta’s Blog
      • John Grace’s Blog
      • Ryan Banta’s Blog
      • Guest Blog
    • Forums
    • Store
    • Log in
    ELITETRACK
    You are at:Home»Forums»Event Specific Discussion»Sprints»mike gough 40 start

    mike gough 40 start

    Posted In: Sprints

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 10, 2006 at 10:57 am #11555

          this is the 40 start i use last yr but i have made changes this yr and i think its better for me..

          https://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/ss14.htm

          https://www.sportspecific.com/public/444.cfm

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 5:53 am #50686

          hey quik drop me a message and let me know how u prep for ur combine workout..

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 5:58 am #50687

          hey mike would this be the start tech u would teach for a athlete running the 40yd, i know many coaches teach the athlete to get close to the line and i did for many yrs but now i like to have the front foot farther back??

        • Participant
          QUIKAZHELL on January 11, 2006 at 6:17 am #50688

          UT,
          Have you tried that 225 training session to jack up you bench?
          Seems like it may workout but it may be overkill. Seems like half of that volume would be sufficent.
          Also 2x per week will not only kill you CNS for other training but I dont think that it is likely you will be able to do anything else in that session!!
          Also in that bench session I think it would be ok to do once per week leaving 1-2 reps in the tank each set until the end.
          thoughts?

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 6:26 am #50689

          that 225 workout is great thats the only thing i did beside lots of back work, increase my 225 by 12 in six weeks..

        • Participant
          QUIKAZHELL on January 11, 2006 at 7:28 am #50690

          So you did not other lifting for upper body?
          How about for lower body?
          It increased your 225 by 12 in 6 weeks??@@@@!!
          What was it to begin with and what was your 1rm before and after? Also how much did you weigh before and after.

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 7:35 am #50691

          first i cant tell u what my 1rm was before bc i didnt test it but i do know that summer my bp was 365, my 225 before using the program was like 15-16 after 27-28..   i didnt do any upper work besides the bp cycle and lots of pull up rows weight dips.. i was also lifting 4 times per week and running 4 times per week..

        • Participant
          flight05 on January 11, 2006 at 8:03 am #50692

          whoa.
          what position are you? (currently, and will end up at the next level)

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on January 11, 2006 at 8:32 am #50693

          hey mike would this be the start tech u would tech for a athlete running the 40yd, i know many coaches teach the athlete to get close to the line and i did for many yrs but now i like to have the front foot farther back??

          For the guys I've trained for the combine I've always taught a wider stance with the front foot at least one foot off the line and the rear foot about 18 inches behind the front. Really close stance bunched starts from a crouched position aren't good for acceleration.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 8:43 am #50694

          [quote author="utfootball4" date="1136939350"]
          hey mike would this be the start tech u would tech for a athlete running the 40yd, i know many coaches teach the athlete to get close to the line and i did for many yrs but now i like to have the front foot farther back??

          For the guys I've trained for the combine I've always taught a wider stance with the front foot at least one foot off the line and the rear foot about 18 inches behind the front. Really close stance bunched starts from a crouched position aren't good for acceleration.
          [/quote]

          thats interesting 18in from the front foot?..  what do u think about coaches saying the closer u r to the line less distance to the finish??

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on January 11, 2006 at 9:15 am #50695

          I think that is false logic AND inaccurate. It is false logic because placing the foot closer to the starting line doesn't necessarily place the chest closer to the finish line. It's inaccurate because even if it did place you closer to the finish line (which in some cases it might) it puts you in a bad position from which to accelerate. The best position for acceleration is with your feet behind you so that you can push backwards to make your body move forward. If the feet are directly under you in the starting position (which is pretty much required to do a 3-point stance with the hand and forward foot on the line) it isn't a very good position from which to make the initial push and doesn't put the body in to a good position in the first couple strides.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 9:17 am #50696

          makes good sense, but can i still have one arm down and one up? mike did you train ur combines guys for the 40 like you would a short sprinter r what changes u would  make?

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on January 11, 2006 at 9:26 am #50697

          makes good sense, but can i still have one arm down and one up?

          Yeah why not? That's how I've always taught it. In fact, all of my sprinters are very comfortable starting like this also.

          mike did you train ur combines guys for the 40 like you would a short sprinter r what changes u would make?

          In some regards however we focused more on the combine tests and because combine preparation periods are generally short (3-8 weeks) the periodization is minimal compared to a normal sprint setup. Also, as far the actual sprint training I don't do any tempo running and no speed endurance.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 9:33 am #50698

          when i did my tryouts last yr i didnt do any conditioning just prep work and if i had to do it all over again i would include some conditioning bc i think it would help with the position drills and 1 vs1.. when i went for my combine prep classes we did like 16-18×100 every tue and felt like i should have kept that in.. i think this yr i am going to try and hit speed 3x a week mon: acc/wed: top speed work/fri: acc ..  I AM GOING TO TRY AND POST ONE OF SAMPLE WORKOUTS WE DID AT MY COMBINE CAMP TONIGHT WHICH WEEK WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE BEGIN/MIDDLE/LATE PHASE?

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on January 11, 2006 at 9:55 am #50699

          utfootball4-
          I agree that conditioning work is important but I just didn't think tempo work was necessary. I felt that I could get them in better shape (even for the tests you mentioned above) without using tempo running.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on January 11, 2006 at 9:57 am #50700

          How about posting a late phase workout. Also, how long is your total prep for the combine? All of the people I've trained were just coming off football season and had a very short preparation.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 10:14 am #50701

          How about posting a late phase workout. Also, how long is your total prep for the combine? All of the people I've trained were just coming off football season and had a very short preparation.

          total prep 8 weeks:

          WEEK 6:
          mon:
          jog skip 3min
          dynamic lap 300yds of diff drills
          leg swings
          runners strecth
          neurowarmu speed and coord;
          toe taps
          fast hips
          highknee fast tempo
          quick feet
          fast leg alt
          Start drills:
          fall start
          box drop start
          mb start
          contrast speed:
          downhill sprint 4×30
          flyin 30 x4
          dynamic flex

          tue:
          warmup same mon
          neuro wamup same mon
          power work:
          dou leg hop for height 4×4
          lat hops for height 4×4
          boxdrop to vert jump x4
          agility tech
          pro and sprint agility
          dynamic flex

          thur:
          warmup same as mon
          neurowarmup same mon
          start dirlls:
          fall start
          incline finger tip start
          three point start
          contrast speed:
          fall start stride 80yds x4
          flyin 30 4x
          dynamic

          fri:
          warmup
          neurowarmup
          power work same as tue
          agility tech
          long shuttle agility
          dynamic flex

          AS YOU KNOW THIS IS WEEK 6 OF 8 THE EARLIER WEEKS HAD MORE SLED WORK AND SOME SHORT TEMPO 80'S ETC..

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 10:43 am #50702

          utfootball4-
          I agree that conditioning work is important but I just didn't think tempo work was necessary. I felt that I could get them in better shape (even for the tests you mentioned above) without using tempo running.

          i agree mike i think int tempo may be better, i could be wrong what do u think??

        • Participant
          QUIKAZHELL on January 11, 2006 at 10:51 am #50703

          With the double leg and lateral hops for height was this done in place or moving? Was the focus quick ground contact or was it done continous?

          How high was the box for depth jumps?

          Did you practice SLJ's and Verts and go over the proper technique?

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 10:54 am #50704

          With the double leg and lateral hops for height was this done in place or moving? Was the focus quick ground contact or was it done continous?

          How high was the box for depth jumps?

          Did you practice SLJ's and Verts and go over the proper technique?

          yes we did lots of jump tech and taught us the cheat methods also..  if i can remember i think the box depth jumps boxes were like 18-36in depending on the athlete.. lat hops over bags or cones and double leg over hurdles all for quickness..

        • Participant
          QUIKAZHELL on January 11, 2006 at 10:55 am #50705

          [quote author="mike" date="1136953560"]
          utfootball4-
          I agree that conditioning work is important but I just didn't think tempo work was necessary. I felt that I could get them in better shape (even for the tests you mentioned above) without using tempo running.

          i agree mike i think int tempo may be better, i could be wrong what do u think??
          [/quote]

          I do not agree. I think practicing the actual position with other athletes would be best and most specific to getting in shape for the position drills at the combine. I also think if that is not an option than if you have a coach or traininer, mirror drills and drills of that sort at 75% would be useful.
          At the same time general strength circuits, multijump circuits and medball circuits would be benifical. Perhaps Mike can share some examples although the exercises may seem like a diffferent language since its in LSU "Code". LoL.
          The int. tempo I feel would run you down and have a negative effect on recovery after and for the important workouts.

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 11, 2006 at 10:58 am #50706

          it all depends on how the overall training is setup bc like i said at one point we did 12-18×100 every tue with our position drills and it went great..

          https://www.plex.cc/  I KNOW THEY DO LOTS OF INT TEMPO TYPE RUNNING AT THE BEGINNING.

        • Participant
          QUIKAZHELL on January 12, 2006 at 9:23 am #50707

          RE: Parisi Videos.

          I borrowed 3 of the Parisi videos from a co worker of mine.

          So far…

          The Warmup Video was well done but I got really nothing out of it since I used to work at Velocity Sports Performance and its basically the same thing. Plus I have seen undecover of Bill Parisi trainign the NY Giants a few years ago with the same warmup. Unless you are very unfamilar with dynamic warmups and the drills this would be a good video for you.

          The Vertical Jump video would have been great if I had not seen Defranco's video first. It went basically over the same stuff Defranco went over only more in depth. Martin Rooney does very well on videos and is a good speaker. This video also covered some special exercises and plyometrics. All in all I'd say go with the Defranco video if you want to see tips for all the tests. If the vert is your only concern go with the parisi Video. Again it was done very well but doesnt cover much more that you need than Joes video.

          I will review the Deceleration Video tomarrow.

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 12, 2006 at 9:33 am #50708

          ty quik. whos combine prep video is better u think joe r bill.

        • Participant
          QUIKAZHELL on January 12, 2006 at 10:42 am #50709

          I didnt see Bills or even knwo he had one.
          All I can tell you is Joe is the man with that shit. And it actually works. And I like the rugged attitued in that video.

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 12, 2006 at 11:57 am #50710

          im talking about joe vs. parisi combine dvd..

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 12, 2006 at 2:55 pm #50711

          i think i posted this somewhere else also but this was a typical day for us.

          7am wakeup call
          730-8 breakfast
          8-9 rehab mon/fri
          9-1030 speed dev sledpull,absolute mech, sprint work
          1030-11 regeneration shake flex etc
          1130-1230 lunch
          1245 fill out manual take vit, warmup on bike
          1-230 strength dev
          230-3 massage therapy (my fav)
          530-630 position drills
          630 dinner
          730-9 relax
          930 snack
          10 lights out

          wed/sat: flex, aerobic conditioning and work in pool…

          ALSO MIKE THIS WOULD BE A SIMILAR SETUP I WOULD USE FOR THAT OLINEMEN BUT I WOULD MAKE MINOR CHANGES FOR HIM FOR EXAMPLE I WOULD REALLY FOCUS ON THE 225 BC HIS 225 IS WEAK AND THATS SOMETHING THE SCOUTS LOOK FOR IN OLINEMAN..

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 12, 2006 at 2:58 pm #50712

          THIS IS A SAMPLE STRENGTH WORKOUT FOR US:

          MON:
          blk snatch (before speed session)
          db bench alt
          plyo pushups
          abs

          tue:
          block cleans
          squat pp
          glutham
          db mil press
          db sh complex
          front lat pulls

          thur:
          3 way clean
          sled tows
          stepups
          stepups jumps
          bp 180×10/235×8/270×8/315x3x3/230xmax
          rgrip pulls

          fri:
          snatch 3-3-3
          squats
          b-jump super
          incline db
          db rows

          take note this is only 1 week.

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on January 13, 2006 at 8:18 am #50713

          utfootball4-
          I've got a couple questions:
          *In the 9-10:30 session did you do everything you mentioned in one workout? If so, how was it implemented.
          *For the 10:30-11 session what exactly were you doing?
          *Was the vitamin anything special?

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 13, 2006 at 1:35 pm #50714

          hey mike i just got home but i will look for somethings we did tomm bc i have to get up early and train, but I'm sure its nothing ur not all ready doing with your athletes..

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 14, 2006 at 9:42 am #50715

          utfootball4-
          I've got a couple questions:
          *In the 9-10:30 session did you do everything you mentioned in one workout? If so, how was it implemented.
          *For the 10:30-11 session what exactly were you doing?
          *Was the vitamin anything special?

          A:  hey mike that 9-1030 session was either speed or agility and yes a typical workout was like the workout above..

          B: the vit and other supp wasnt nothing special, ur normal stuff..

          C: just like the plan said; they had diff recovery shakes u know with protein/glut etc and lots of active cooldowns/flex, also hydrotherapy/contrasting showers/acupuncture etc.. the
          acupuncture was new to me but i tryed to have a open mind and it worked pretty well..

          ANYMORE QUESTIONS I WILL TRY MY BEST TO ANSWER, SO SHOOT?

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on January 14, 2006 at 9:43 am #50716

          So were weights done before speed work?

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 14, 2006 at 9:51 am #50717

          So were weights done before speed work?

          NO never we always had about 2.5hrs between speed and weight..

          speed first then weights later..

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on January 14, 2006 at 9:57 am #50718

          Then what do you mean by this:

          MON:
          blk snatch (before speed session)

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on January 14, 2006 at 10:07 am #50719

          ok sorry that day was: i think the reason why he had this workout setup this way is bc blk snatch requires lots of speed and i think he wanted us to be fresh so we could have good bar speed, thats just a guess..

          mon:
          blk snatch 50×6 57.5×4 67.5x4x2
          tall fall sprints 4×10
          get offs 4×10
          absolute speed 4/15
          power skips 2×30
          depth jump sprint 6×10
          super man bj 1×12
          db bp alt 12 10 4×8
          plyo pushups 3×10
          ab work
          3 pos situps 2×25
          cross overs 1×30
          side v 1×30
          hanging leg raises 1×15
          wood choppers 1×30

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on February 14, 2006 at 10:28 am #50720

          I think that is false logic AND inaccurate. It is false logic because placing the foot closer to the starting line doesn't necessarily place the chest closer to the finish line. It's inaccurate because even if it did place you closer to the finish line (which in some cases it might) it puts you in a bad position from which to accelerate. The best position for acceleration is with your feet behind you so that you can push backwards to make your body move forward. If the feet are directly under you in the starting position (which is pretty much required to do a 3-point stance with the hand and forward foot on the line) it isn't a very good position from which to make the initial push and doesn't put the body in to a good position in the first couple strides.

          hey mike im watching the parisi 40yd dvd and they are teaching the 40yd stance as this:

          front foot 4 in behind line
          back foot even with front heel and 6in to the side
          weight is on balls of feet
          back flat

          what u think about this one?

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on February 14, 2006 at 7:28 pm #50721

          That's pretty similar to how I teach football guys to do it but I like a slightly higher hip position.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on February 15, 2006 at 5:07 am #50722

          That's pretty similar to how I teach football guys to do it but I like a slightly higher hip position.

          u mention earlier that u teach them to have front foot about 1 foot behind the line and back foot about 18in behind the front foot?..

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on February 15, 2006 at 7:59 am #50723

          The front foot position is a little more variable but I typically don't like it right on the line. In my opinion having the feet further behind the COM in the set position far outweighs any benefit from being closer to the line.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on March 2, 2006 at 11:25 am #50724

          HERE IS SOMEMORE OF THE WORKOUTS WE DID.. BELOW IS OUR FIRST LOWER BODY WORKOUT OF THE WEEK- TUE

          STATIONARY SPEED WARMUP:

          HIP MOBILITY:

          MOVEMENT PREP:

          ANKLE WORK:

          BALLISTIC LOWER BODY:
          JUMP SQUATS 4X6X95

          POWER LOWER BODY:
          PUSH JERK 5X2X185

          STRENGTH/SHOCK COMPLEX LOWER BODY:
          PAUSE BOX SQUAT 5X2X85%/3 VERT JUMPS

          ACCESSORY:
          POST CHAIN: GLUTHAM 10-8-6
          LOWER BACK:PYYSIO LOW BACK EXT 20-16-13

          CORE:
          PYSIO TWIST CRUNCH
          CARTWHEELS
          SPEED RUSS TWIST
          SOMERSAUITS

          ISO LUNGE: 3X20X40LB DB

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on March 3, 2006 at 6:58 am #50725

          What kind of things did you do in the stationary speed warmup?

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on March 3, 2006 at 10:14 am #50726

          nothing special just a fancy name:

          Perform 1 round:
          prisoner squat
          inverted hamstring
          lunge twist
          forward lunge instep
          drop lunge walk
          toe touch walk

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on April 15, 2006 at 12:49 am #50727

          utfootball4-
          I agree that conditioning work is important but I just didn't think tempo work was necessary. I felt that I could get them in better shape (even for the tests you mentioned above) without using tempo running.

          so what kind of conditioning did you use?

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on April 20, 2006 at 10:27 am #50728

          any tips mike on the conditoning mike?

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on April 22, 2006 at 10:55 am #50729

          Sorry for the delayed response. I did lots of general strength, low intensity med ball, low intensity jump circuits and weight lifting circuits rather than tempo running.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on April 22, 2006 at 11:14 am #50730

          do u think it would be hard for me to do the following since i am during the cad program with all the jumps etc

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on April 22, 2006 at 7:00 pm #50731

          I think it would work fine if placed on the appropriate days in the appropriate volumes.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on April 23, 2006 at 9:52 am #50732

          i think with the this cad just doing some simple tempo run would be the easy way to go ex: 10×60 or 14×80 etc.

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on June 4, 2006 at 8:50 pm #50733

          what do you guys think about the 45degree body angle, i know praisi speed school are now teaching a 30degree body angle bc you save by going out instead of up?

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on June 8, 2006 at 9:10 am #50734

          what do you guys think about the 45degree body angle, i know praisi speed school are now teaching a 30degree body angle bc you save by going out instead of up?

          What angles are you referring to? Initial departure angle? If so, I don't think a blanket / uniform departure angle is suitable for everyone. Stronger more powerful athletes can typically handle lower angles.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on June 8, 2006 at 9:16 am #50735

          [quote author="utfootball4" date="1149434437"]
          what do you guys think about the 45degree body angle, i know praisi speed school are now teaching a 30degree body angle bc you save by going out instead of up?

          What angles are you referring to? Initial departure angle? If so, I don't think a blanket / uniform departure angle is suitable for everyone. Stronger more powerful athletes can typically handle lower angles.
          [/quote]

          yes im talking about departure angles.

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on June 8, 2006 at 9:18 am #50736

          30 seems pretty low, especially without blocks. Generally speaking I think something between 35-45 would be better for a foot ball 40.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on June 8, 2006 at 9:23 am #50737

          30 seems pretty low, especially without blocks. Generally speaking I think something between 35-45 would be better for a foot ball 40.

          thats what i thought also, but he said at a 45 u r popping right up which causes wasted  time on the stop watch. he said when you are in your stance you should just be thinking about punching the top of your head through the door.  also when teaching the 40 do you teach ur guys to start making that transition of coming upright around 12-15yds or is it further out like some guys do?

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on June 14, 2006 at 11:29 am #50738

          I don't really teach them to come up at a certain point. At least I don't emphasize it. I just like to see that they make a gradual postural transition. Football guys typically don't need to be coached to get upright as the best ones tend to be great accelerators with lower top end speed (as compared to 100m runners of a similar level) who are naturally upright much quicker.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          mharris on June 17, 2006 at 9:57 am #50739

          say mike, i agree with your "variable release angle theorum" (fancy name, huh?) you stated June 8 mainly because i think a 30 degree release angle is a little to linear and takes uber strength to accomplish without falling flat on your face. I find my release angle is little to vertical instead of horizontal. When coming out of my stance should my release be more vertical than horizontal? I try this sometimes but i keep falling flat on my face. literally.

        • Participant
          mharris on June 22, 2006 at 6:01 am #50740

          Hey guys. I run a 4.48 electronically timed 40yd dash so around how fast should I be able to run the 100m?

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on June 22, 2006 at 9:12 am #50741

          Hey guys. I run a 4.48 electronically timed 40yd dash so around how fast should I be able to run the 100m?

          lol no way to tell too many factors reaction, top speed speed end

        • Participant
          mharris on June 23, 2006 at 3:24 am #50742

          couldnt you just give me a rough estimate?

        • Participant
          mharris on June 23, 2006 at 3:45 am #50743

          Maybe its just me but I find more efficient starts can be achieved by running out of your stance THAN jumping out of it. Jumping out causes the rear foot to be too far in front of the COM which is a no no when your in the acceleration stage and just ends up leading to a braking action thus limiting your ability to reach top speed in the latter part of the race.

          Now when I say "running out of your stance", I mean pull your grounded hand backward to initiate the explosion. Its kinda like a chain reaction because when you pull that hand backwards, it automatically shifts your momentum forward.

          Is this right?

        • Participant
          mikeice on June 23, 2006 at 3:47 am #50744

          couldnt you just give me a rough estimate?
          10.8-11.2

        • Participant
          utfootball4 on June 23, 2006 at 4:51 am #50745

          [quote author="mharris" date="1151013302"]
          couldnt you just give me a rough estimate?
          10.8-11.2

          [/quote]

          ur right i could be anywhere from 10.6-11.3 just depends on ur speed endurance bc u can me really from 0-35m but drop big time after that. i run 4.40-4.46e in the 40yd also and i know how the 100m feel when i am not training for it its long.

        • Participant
          mharris on June 23, 2006 at 7:28 am #50746

          that seems like a fair estimate. most people i know who run ELECTRONIC 4.4's (not that hand timed bull) are somewhere in the late 10's to early 11's

        • Participant
          mharris on June 24, 2006 at 10:51 pm #50747

          This may be a little off topic but about how many tenths of a second slower will a 40yd dash ran on grass be compared to one run on a track? I bet UT or Mike would know.

    Viewing 62 reply threads
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
    Log In
    Like Us On Facebook
    - Facebook Members WordPress Plugin
    Highest Rated Posts
    • A Review of 400m Training Methods 79 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 5 (4.92 out of 5)
    • 2008 Olympics: Usain’s Insane 100m 67 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 5 (4.96 out of 5)
    • Top 10 Myths of Sprinting Mechanics 66 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 5 (4.74 out of 5)
    • 14 reasons why Jamaica is the Sprint Capitol of the World 59 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 5 (4.85 out of 5)
    • 12 Reasons to Squat Year Round 58 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 5 (4.86 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why All Athletes Should Sprint 63 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 5 (4.32 out of 5)
    • 4 Tips for Keeping up with Sport Science Research 65 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 5 (4.03 out of 5)
    • Loren Seagrave’s thoughts on Absolute Strength 54 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 5 (4.80 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why Jamaicans Dominate the Sprints 50 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 5 (4.78 out of 5)
    • Developing Endurance in Speed-Power Athletes 58 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 5 (4.09 out of 5)
    Recent Topics
    • ?Where I can start in multievents trainig?
    • Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • Which fitness equipment do you use to exercise?
    About

    ELITETRACK is one of the longest standing sport training & conditioning sites on the web. We feature over 250 articles and 1000s of blog posts from some of the most knowledgeable and experienced track & field coaches on the web.

    Recent Posts
    • What You Should be Doing on Your Rest Days
    • Enjoying Sports into Retirement
    • Best Time in The Day to Workout
    • Should You Do Strength Training After 50?
    • What Are the Main Causes of Rounded Shoulders?
    Forum Activity
    • rudeboy on ?Where I can start in multievents trainig?
    • Pablo25 on How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • Josh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • Josh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • Josh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2015.
    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2021.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.