Facebook Twitter Instagram
    ELITETRACK
    • Home
    • Articles
      • Endurance
      • Flexibility
      • Hurdles
      • Jumps
        • High Jump
        • Long Jump
        • Pole Vault
        • Triple Jump
      • Multi-Events
      • Periodization
      • Relays
      • Sports Science
        • Biomechanics
        • Coaching Science
        • Exercise Physiology
        • Muscle Dynamics
        • Nutrition
        • Restoration
        • Sport Psychology
      • Sprints
      • Strength Training
      • Throws
        • Discus
        • Hammer
        • Javelin
        • Shot Put
    • Blog
      • Mike Young’s Blog
      • Carl Valle’s Blog
      • John Evan’s Blog
      • Antonio Squillante’s Blog
      • Vern Gambetta’s Blog
      • John Grace’s Blog
      • Ryan Banta’s Blog
      • Guest Blog
    • Forums
    • Store
    • Log in
    ELITETRACK
    You are at:Home»Forums»Training & Conditioning Discussion»Strength & Conditioning»Sets to failure….

    Sets to failure….

    Posted In: Strength & Conditioning

        • Participant
          QUIKAZHELL on April 3, 2003 at 10:12 pm #8315

          some say good some say bad… however i feel differnt peoples idea of sets to failure differs…
          as everyone knows max strength gains are achived by lifting high loads under 5 reps. so my question is for a person who max bench presses 300 pounds and can do 270 for 2 sets of 3 and the last set can only do 2 reps is that considered to failure? when i think of failure i think of doing a lighter weight and burning out usually above 8-10 reps.. and the reason people may think this is bad and only needed during certain phases is because it deals with mitocondia and getting oxygen to the muscle.. can someone elablorate what they think of as failure and when to do and when not to do this as well as the benifits.. because as sprinters we want to get strength without size so usually do 3-4 reps of power exersises such as bench squat clean shoulder press.. but if you are not doing the 3-4 reps to failure i feel you are not gettin the same strength benefit..
          ??????

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on April 3, 2003 at 10:25 pm #19460

          Actually strength gains come best at multiple sets under a high load rather than 1-2 sets at a high load taken to failure. So instead of 2 x 3-5 (taken to failure) @ 90% , you’d be much better off doing 8 x 2 @ 90% or even (and contrary to intuition) 4 x 2 @ 90%. I don’t have much time to elaborate as I’m about to leave for Texas but will do so when I get back.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          QUIKAZHELL on April 3, 2003 at 10:27 pm #19461

          ok i understamd but the 2 reps would be to failure am i correct?

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on April 4, 2003 at 9:07 am #19462

          Haha-
          I found a Schlotzskis Deli in Austin, TX that has internet computers.

          Quick-
          Actually the 2 reps would be sub-maximal / non-failure. Don’t by in to the H.I.T.T. stuff. I’ll explain more later.

          ELITETRACK Founder

        • Participant
          QUIKAZHELL on April 4, 2003 at 9:44 am #19463

          what is H.I.T.T.? but mike this can wait…. no need to run around to in and out of deli’s and coffe shops looking for internet computers… next thing ya know youre gonna get the internet on your cell phone and respond on there… anyway good luck to you and your team in texas…tty when u get back!

        • Participant
          Kebba Tolbert on April 7, 2003 at 2:01 am #19464

          [i]Originally posted by QUIKAZHELL[/i]
          ok i understamd but the 2 reps would be to failure am i correct?

          when we do 10×2 or something like it… it is usually at a certain pctage (usually 80-95%). Sometimes we’ll pyramid up, pryamid down. or both within the set.

          So a 10 x 2 could look like this for a person with a PR of 100K

          set 1 and 2 – 75k from hang
          set 3 – 85k from floor
          set 4 -70-85k from flloor w/jerk finish
          sets 5-6 – from hang at 80k w/front dquat fiinish
          sets 7-8 – from floor at 90k
          sets 9-10 – from hang at 75k with jerk finsih

          obviously there are tons of other variations but this is an example of something i will do depending on what i see. If things are looking very good (i.e., from a timing and rhytmic standpoint) i will often tell the athlete sometime after set 4-7 to:
          1) go to singles at a higher percentage than they had been working at or

          2 )to try for a new PR or

          3) to finish out the workout with sets of 2 at their current PR

          you’d be suprised how often they’re able to get new PR’s in this type of envrionment

        • Keymaster
          Mike Young on April 7, 2003 at 10:39 am #19465

          Quick,
          H.I.T. stands for High Intensity Training and has quite a big following. The basic idea behind it is that volume should be minimal and every set should be taken to failure to maximize muscle / motor unit activation. Basically, it sounds good on paper but in reality is a bunch of crock. It might have a place in training for the purpose of variety but it’s purported benefits do not live up to the claims (indicated by several research studies as well as anecdotal evidence).

          Keep in mind that almost all of the top olympic weightlifters in the past decade have used very high loads lifted for submaximal repitions for numerous sets. For example, 10 x 2 @ 90%. Under this protocol, an athlete is able to lift 20 total reps at a 90% load. If they were to take sets to failure they would perhaps only be able to lift a total of 6 reps @ 90%. Not only does this allow for a greater volume of work to be done at a very high intensity, but it also is slightly sub-maximal, meaning a faster and perhaps greater supercompensation. This would explain why even 4 x 2 @ 90% would yield greater strength gains than 2 sets taken to failure at 90% (for perhaps 3 reps on set 1 and then 2 reps on set 2).

          I’ve used something similar to Kebba’s routine but have also performed straight sets without variation other than the load. I think doing it like this (straight sets with varying increasing load) offers a great opportunity to work the whole speed continuum. This however can only be done if the lighter sets are not just viewed as ‘warmup sets’ but rather as opportunities to develop power through higher velocity movement. Power is best developed with loads in the 55-65% range and the lighter sets that most would view as ‘warmup’ can actually be used for serious training.

          ELITETRACK Founder

    Viewing 6 reply threads
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
    Log In
    Like Us On Facebook
    - Facebook Members WordPress Plugin
    Highest Rated Posts
    • A Review of 400m Training Methods 79 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 5 (4.92 out of 5)
    • 2008 Olympics: Usain’s Insane 100m 67 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 5 (4.96 out of 5)
    • Top 10 Myths of Sprinting Mechanics 66 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 5 (4.74 out of 5)
    • 14 reasons why Jamaica is the Sprint Capitol of the World 59 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 5 (4.85 out of 5)
    • 12 Reasons to Squat Year Round 58 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 5 (4.86 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why All Athletes Should Sprint 63 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 5 (4.32 out of 5)
    • 4 Tips for Keeping up with Sport Science Research 65 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 5 (4.03 out of 5)
    • Loren Seagrave’s thoughts on Absolute Strength 54 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 5 (4.80 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why Jamaicans Dominate the Sprints 50 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 5 (4.78 out of 5)
    • Developing Endurance in Speed-Power Athletes 58 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 5 (4.09 out of 5)
    Recent Topics
    • ?Where I can start in multievents trainig?
    • Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • Which fitness equipment do you use to exercise?
    About

    ELITETRACK is one of the longest standing sport training & conditioning sites on the web. We feature over 250 articles and 1000s of blog posts from some of the most knowledgeable and experienced track & field coaches on the web.

    Recent Posts
    • Body of Work
    • Common Training Mistakes Relating to Poor Planning
    • Best Tips for Breaking Through a Strength Training Plateau
    • Making Shapes
    • Looking Back to Help You Move Ahead
    Forum Activity
    • rudeboy on ?Where I can start in multievents trainig?
    • Pablo25 on How and when do hamstring injuries occur?
    • Josh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • Josh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    • Josh Hurlebaus on Josh Hurlebaus Masters Training Log
    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2015.
    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2021.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.