Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    ELITETRACK
    • Home
    • Articles
      • Endurance
      • Flexibility
      • Hurdles
      • Jumps
        • High Jump
        • Long Jump
        • Pole Vault
        • Triple Jump
      • Multi-Events
      • Periodization
      • Relays
      • Sports Science
        • Biomechanics
        • Coaching Science
        • Exercise Physiology
        • Muscle Dynamics
        • Nutrition
        • Restoration
        • Sport Psychology
      • Sprints
      • Strength Training
      • Throws
        • Discus
        • Hammer
        • Javelin
        • Shot Put
    • Blog
      • Mike Young’s Blog
      • Carl Valle’s Blog
      • John Evan’s Blog
      • Antonio Squillante’s Blog
      • Vern Gambetta’s Blog
      • John Grace’s Blog
      • Ryan Banta’s Blog
      • Guest Blog
    • Forums
    • Store
    ELITETRACK
    You are at:Home»John Grace's Blog»Simulation vs. Specificity

    Simulation vs. Specificity

    0
    By John Grace on December 19, 2013 John Grace's Blog
    Facebook9
    Twitter0
    LinkedIn0
    Google+0
    Pinterest1

    Simulation and specificity are two concepts that can easily be confused with one another. Simulation is the act of performing an event in it’s entirety or a segment of the event during training. Specificity is choosing exercises that aim to train the energy systems that closely resemble the metabolic and nervous system demands that an athlete would encounter during competition.

    When planning your training, it is important to distinguish between the two concepts and to use them properly.

    Simulation could be a shot putter throwing a lighter or heavier shot, a pitcher throwing a weighted baseball, or a golfer trying to improve swing power on a cable machine. Specificity, on the other hand, could be considered a sprinter performing power cleans or a soccer player performing repeat sprints.

    While specificity and simulation can potentially cross over – a 100m runner performing sprints or a weightlifter performing the snatch and clean & jerk, it is important to remember that you can also improve at your sport by performing movements that don’t necessarily mimic the sport.

    One common mistake is to design training methods which look like the event itself, but neglect to meet the exact energetic, metabolic, and nervous system requirements.
    • Share on Twitter
    • Share on Facebook

    A weightlifter could oftentimes sprint (10-15m) or perform a variety of plyos. Neither of which are directly simulating the weightlifting movements, but the demands on the body are closely related – exerting a large amount of force over a short period of time.?”Just because an exercise looks like the event doesn’t make it effective. Likewise, just because an exercise doesn’t look like the event, doesn’t make it ineffective.” Using different exercises while maintaining specificity can also aid in reducing overuse injuries and maintaining freshness in training.

    There does need to be a focus on simulation as you get close to the event (especially if you’re a sport coach that doubles as the team’s strength & conditioning coach), but don’t get too caught up in what looks like the sporting movement and what doesn’t. Worry about energy system demands and how you can closely relate that to your training.

    Reference:
    Brunner, Rick. Tabachnik Ph.D, Ben. Soviet Training & Recovery Methods. Sport Focus Publishing. 1990. pg 47

    • Bio
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Latest Posts
    John Grace

    John Grace

    Sport Performance Coach at Athletic Lab
    John is a Sport Performance Coach at Athletic Lab. He earned his Master's degree from Ohio University in Coaching & Sport Science. John holds his CSCS, USAW-L1, and USATF-L1. He is the former Assistant Fitness Coach of the MLS Vancouver Whitecaps FC.
    John Grace

    @john_r_grace

    John Grace

    John Grace

    John Grace

    Latest posts by John Grace (see all)

    • Why NBA Players Shouldn’t be Criticized for Resting in the Regular Season - March 22, 2017
    • Q&A with Dan Pfaff - January 6, 2017
    • Horizontal vs. Vertical Forces Debate… Debunked? Q&A with Mike Young - November 16, 2016
    • Velocity Based Training Q&A with Dan Baker - October 29, 2016
    • Should We Use High Pulls for Power Development? - September 22, 2016
    coaching simulation specificity training
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Speed 101 – The Essence of It

    An “Aha!” Moment – The Javelin Dance

    Training Dos & Don’ts #5: Thoughts on Tapering & Peaking for Swimming

    Highest Rated Posts
    • A Review of 400m Training Methods 79 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 579 votes, average: 4.92 out of 5 (4.92 out of 5)
    • 2008 Olympics: Usain’s Insane 100m 67 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 567 votes, average: 4.96 out of 5 (4.96 out of 5)
    • Top 10 Myths of Sprinting Mechanics 66 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 566 votes, average: 4.74 out of 5 (4.74 out of 5)
    • 14 reasons why Jamaica is the Sprint Capitol of the World 59 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 559 votes, average: 4.85 out of 5 (4.85 out of 5)
    • 12 Reasons to Squat Year Round 58 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 558 votes, average: 4.86 out of 5 (4.86 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why All Athletes Should Sprint 63 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 563 votes, average: 4.32 out of 5 (4.32 out of 5)
    • 4 Tips for Keeping up with Sport Science Research 65 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 565 votes, average: 4.03 out of 5 (4.03 out of 5)
    • Loren Seagrave’s thoughts on Absolute Strength 54 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 554 votes, average: 4.80 out of 5 (4.80 out of 5)
    • 6 Reasons Why Jamaicans Dominate the Sprints 50 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 550 votes, average: 4.78 out of 5 (4.78 out of 5)
    • Developing Endurance in Speed-Power Athletes 58 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 558 votes, average: 4.09 out of 5 (4.09 out of 5)
    Recent Posts
    • The Science of Home Runs: What Makes Baseball’s Elite Power Hitters Unique
    • Top Fitness Body Scanners for Accurate Health Insights
    • The Cheapest Personal Trainer Certifications of 2026
    • How to Build a Weekly Running Plan That Improves Race Performance
    • What Coaches See Before Anyone Else: Spotting and Supporting Athletes Through Unhealthy Patterns

    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2023.

    ELITETRACK by Human Performance Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2023.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.